Postmodernism and Metanarratives Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Postmodernism and Metanarratives - Essay Example The essay "Postmodernism and Metanarratives" states the postmodernism and discovers our liberation from metanarratives. In the department of American philosophy, postmodernism approach is little accepted to knowledge and truth. A metanarrative is an idea that people think it’s a comprehensive explanation of knowledge or historical experience. It is a global cultural narrative schema that explains and orders experience and knowledge. As used, Meta means â€Å"about â€Å"while a narrative is a story that is built in a fashion that is sequential. A metanarrative is therefore a story that explains a story encompassing other small stories within schemes that are totalizing. This notion, that reality is community oriented, also appeals to very few Christian theologians. Because there is no any universality accepted postmodern philosophy, but there are many, there are few consistent themes that happen to emerge from every mainstream postmodern writer. The many issues surrounding p ostmodernism today leaves us asking ourselves if we have been liberated from metanarratives and if we should be. The main theme of postmodern philosophy is that it denies the objective truth, which is universal. This is well declared in a statement that is so famous, â€Å"incredulity towards metanarrative†. A meatanarrative is a unifying story that tries to tell about the world. People should be skeptical of broad explanations like those ones. The statement, that God so loved the world is treated as nonsensical by postmodernists.

Policy Theory - Disparities and access to healthy food in the United Essay

Policy Theory - Disparities and access to healthy food in the United States - Essay Example also another assumption that political systems in any society are stratified into different groups with some people being the decision makers who directly make the laws and policies. There are others who are influential and play a part in advising the decision makers based on their interests and opinions. Lastly there are the rest of the people who are combined in one large group with minority power and influence despite their numbers. The role of the large group is to implement the decisions made by the decision makers as well as to vote for them otherwise they highly remain to be seen and not heard. In order for the disparity in access to healthy food in the country to be addressed properly and changed, those with the power have to be aware of the issue and should be influenced to use their power to make and amend policies surrounding the issue. In order for this to have, advocacy based on strategy is necessary to ensure that the elite use their power and wealth to target the issue directly. The first of these strategies is to develop relationship with the decision makers or the influential. The influential are bound to raise the issue to the decision makers making them take notice and pass policies (Barker, 2008). It is also important to form alliances with other important partners and especially in the economic sector. They can assist in decision making with the political elite or use their economic power to make the decisions happen in case of any resistance. This may not be easy and the population may need to shift their social norms and accommodate the elite if they are to win them over. In case the decision makers are the political leaders, they may be needed to increase political will towards the leader and strengthen their base of support. This is likely to meet their approval and they may readily make the policy changes. Lastly is to ensure to have evidence in form of research lined up to back the claim for a need for policy change or new policy